<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimize your Windows Vista with Stardock&#8217;s TweakVista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.avirtualexit.com/2007/06/23/optimize-your-windows-vista-with-stardocks-tweakvista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.avirtualexit.com/2007/06/23/optimize-your-windows-vista-with-stardocks-tweakvista/</link>
	<description>Social Networks,Tech Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:32:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gili</title>
		<link>http://www.avirtualexit.com/2007/06/23/optimize-your-windows-vista-with-stardocks-tweakvista/comment-page-1/#comment-1459</link>
		<dc:creator>Gili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avirtualexit.com/2007/06/23/optimize-your-windows-vista-with-stardocks-tweakvista/#comment-1459</guid>
		<description>Vista isn&#039;t too popular and that&#039;s perfectly understood.
I think that Microsoft&#039;s conception that users need actually to upgrade their hardware in order to run a new Operating System is totally wrong. No wonder users are punishing them, and opting for other alternatives such as Linux , or just staying with the good old Win XP and simply don&#039;t upgrade.

Gili</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vista isn&#8217;t too popular and that&#8217;s perfectly understood.<br />
I think that Microsoft&#8217;s conception that users need actually to upgrade their hardware in order to run a new Operating System is totally wrong. No wonder users are punishing them, and opting for other alternatives such as Linux , or just staying with the good old Win XP and simply don&#8217;t upgrade.</p>
<p>Gili</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mv3gp</title>
		<link>http://www.avirtualexit.com/2007/06/23/optimize-your-windows-vista-with-stardocks-tweakvista/comment-page-1/#comment-1423</link>
		<dc:creator>mv3gp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 06:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avirtualexit.com/2007/06/23/optimize-your-windows-vista-with-stardocks-tweakvista/#comment-1423</guid>
		<description>I think Vista is too heavy and didnt know any one how is using vista. Is vista popular ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Vista is too heavy and didnt know any one how is using vista. Is vista popular ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gili</title>
		<link>http://www.avirtualexit.com/2007/06/23/optimize-your-windows-vista-with-stardocks-tweakvista/comment-page-1/#comment-1349</link>
		<dc:creator>Gili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avirtualexit.com/2007/06/23/optimize-your-windows-vista-with-stardocks-tweakvista/#comment-1349</guid>
		<description>Shashank,
I tend to disagree. I run Vista on a 1 GB, performance is completely OK. I believe the key is not use the 3d effects, and implement the performance tricks i mentioned in this blog (Including this last utility).
Gili</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shashank,<br />
I tend to disagree. I run Vista on a 1 GB, performance is completely OK. I believe the key is not use the 3d effects, and implement the performance tricks i mentioned in this blog (Including this last utility).<br />
Gili</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shashank</title>
		<link>http://www.avirtualexit.com/2007/06/23/optimize-your-windows-vista-with-stardocks-tweakvista/comment-page-1/#comment-1346</link>
		<dc:creator>Shashank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avirtualexit.com/2007/06/23/optimize-your-windows-vista-with-stardocks-tweakvista/#comment-1346</guid>
		<description>Vista don&#039;t even run good at 1 Gb ...and thilak says vista sucks even at 2 Gb so ....do u want to have a chance..:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vista don&#8217;t even run good at 1 Gb &#8230;and thilak says vista sucks even at 2 Gb so &#8230;.do u want to have a chance..:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashish Saini (Ashfame)</title>
		<link>http://www.avirtualexit.com/2007/06/23/optimize-your-windows-vista-with-stardocks-tweakvista/comment-page-1/#comment-1307</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashish Saini (Ashfame)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 17:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avirtualexit.com/2007/06/23/optimize-your-windows-vista-with-stardocks-tweakvista/#comment-1307</guid>
		<description>Many bloggers are blogging about Vista since it was launched, some even have dedicated categories for Vista. But I have not got a chance of playing with it cuz i ma PC just has 256MB DDR RAM. I wonder when I will get a chance. You keep up the good work, Gili!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many bloggers are blogging about Vista since it was launched, some even have dedicated categories for Vista. But I have not got a chance of playing with it cuz i ma PC just has 256MB DDR RAM. I wonder when I will get a chance. You keep up the good work, Gili!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.406 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
